Suzuki's are the worst bikes for corrosion.
Most people that slag Suzukis finish only do so because they've fallen for the myth that every other bike manufacturer is better.
I wasn't talking about corrosion exactly, more rubbing ... See below my (ex) Suzuki SV 650 2000 which was mine until I converted to a Vstrom, now abused by my bf. Note the lack of wear and tear on the metal. This bike is 10 years old, has been commuted (rain or shine) on by me for well over 1 month.
http://i784.photobucket.com/albums/yy12 ... ure006.jpgNow compare with my
NEW 2010 reg Vstrom 650 which I got my hands on 1 March 2010 and have been commuting on (rain or shine), and playing on nealry every day since:
http://i784.photobucket.com/albums/yy12 ... ure003.jpgAs far as I'm concerned its not a myth, but I see it every day just before I get on the bike. How come my new bike doesn't make it past 1 month before the the black stuff starts deterorating? I'd call that a ****** finish
Also, as both these are Suzuki's, is it fair to say the older bikes are better made than the newer ones? I can't really comment as I have only ridden 5 different bikes, the SV being the oldest ...
Please don't misunderstand I love my V Strom to bits (I loved the SV just alil bit less than my strom), but after deciding that buying a new bike was a good idea, I kind of resent it looking tatty after a few weeks
Oh, and as I haven't posted it here yet my sexy V strom in all its paint-rubbed-slightly-off-frame glory
(still with nasty stickers atm as I don't own a haridryer
)
http://i784.photobucket.com/albums/yy12 ... ure005.jpg